--- On Thu, 11/17/11, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> On 11/17/11 4:26 PM, Pedro Giffuni > wrote: > > Committed as revision 1203218. > > > > Thank you very much for your contribution! > > > > i very much appreciate that we accept and integrate > everything at the moment. But should we maybe a little bit > more careful? And should we focus more on our main common > goal to provide a stable version asap? > > I thought we would have agreed to only make the code base > Apache conform and work on replacements for license critical > things. We are now in a phase where we integrate many > patches from Issuezilla that are not yet integrated for > specific reasons (maybe not reviewed, not complete, too bad > etc.). We integrate things without real testing the changes. > I am not sure if we should do that at the moment. > > What do others think about it? > OK, I agree that I've been very light on my review of what should be committed: in this case I took into account that the submitter knows well the code and the issue is clearly evidenced in the bugzilla report. I think we should be much more proactive here at Apache, and the situation where bugs are extremely old is not really desirable (and that's, I think, the idea behind "lazy consensus"). I will slow down though, I understand perfectly that I cannot go around destabilizing things while you guys are doing important cleanups. Pedro.
