--- On Thu, 11/17/11, Ariel Constenla-Haile <arie...@apache.org> wrote:
> > IMO the tango icons look uglier than the Galaxy icon set, > but it's just > a question of taste. And the Galaxy is the only one we can > be sure that > has all the required icons. (try the tango icon set and > you'll see that > OOo still uses some Galaxy icons for the missing icons). > What happens now in OOo from Oracle's times if you remove > the crystal icon set > from OOo installation? ... it will default to the default > icon set; your > patch was changing the existing behaviour. > OK, you convinced me. :) > On the other hand, AOO is removing copy left stuff from the > source code, > but not removing the functionality in the OOo side, that is > fine as it > is code now under the AL. So it seems that the approach > with the images > should be to add some configure switches to enable them > providing some > --with-system-crystal-icons or --with-system-icons etc. > OK, but that doesnt look easy. I will have to think of something that is not ugly and we still cant ship LGPL :( Pedro.
