On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton <orc...@apache.org> wrote: > Rob, are you saying that you would not edit ooo-site simply because it is not > being served as OpenOffice.org ? >
No. > There are many ways that assistance is welcome, especially if folks notice > the breakages and report them in a way where they can be swept up in the > preparation of the staging site either before or after cut-over. > Yes. > I believe that is a false contrast. Perhaps it is simply that folks aren't > aware that help proofing and coming up with fixes to the site are welcome. > ? > Folks can see the results on ooo-site, come up with further ideas, etc. > Think of it as the running draft version of the soon-to-migrate > OpenOffice.org site. > My question was what was needed before we can go live. I'm hoping we're not waiting for a greater degree of perfection than existed in the legacy website. > - Dennis > > PS 1. This podling has not been in existence for 6 months (yet); site > migration and terms of use was not early on the agenda by any means. We entered incubation on 6/13/11. Our six month anniversary will officially be in 2 more days. My humble apologies for the gross exaggeration. > 2. Leave me out of the hyperbole please. > 3. I also believe that I said I had no objection to the current wording on > the wiki notice. If not, I'm saying it now. I have no objection to this: < > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=OpenOffice.org_Wiki:Copyrights&oldid=198563>. > It addresses my fundamental concern. > 4. And I have had nothing whatsoever to do with any extended duration of > this particular thread. Although thanks for the inviting mention. > A few posts earlier in this thread Dave said that one of the steps remaining before we go live was: "Make sure that Trademarks and Dennis don't have any issues with license notices and copyright." I'm glad to hear now that this is not an issue. -Rob > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] > Sent: Sunday, December 11, 2011 12:06 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Subject: Re: Rationalizing two OpenOffice websites > > [ ... ] > > Again, the ability to edit absent the ability to publish, is not going > to encourage effective collaboration. > > Let's get to "release early and often" on the website. Waiting months > for the ability to publish is not healthy for the community. > > So what is the least that is required technically to make this live? > We can deal with your and Dennis's 6 month long debate about terms of > use later. > > [ ... ] >
