On Sat, Dec 17, 2011 at 3:42 PM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > On 17 December 2011 19:25, Dennis E. Hamilton <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: >> Does that include converters and commercial offerings that have embedded >> support for ODF consumption and production? (I suppose if Symphony is in >> that diagram, the answer is yes at least for embedded support.) >> > > Yes, although I realise a request for an itemisation of *everything* > is probably unrealistic. What I want is something that gives an idea > of the reach of ODF and therefore the potential sphere of influence > that Apache OpenOffice code, under a permissive license, might have. >
The Wikipedia article is a good source of ODF-supporting applications and tools. But we should avoid stereotyping OpenOffice as being only an ODF editor. It has broad support for importing and exporting many other formats, standard as well as well-established proprietary formats. In the end there are multiple, overlapping ecosystems, of code, of standards, etc. -Rob > Ross > > >> - Dennis >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Ross Gardler [mailto:rgard...@opendirective.com] >> Sent: Saturday, December 17, 2011 09:25 >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Time for the ASF to send an Open Letter? >> >> [ ... ] >> >> I don't want to get into marking territory, comparing size, arguing over >> who is better or more active or inactive or whatever. I want facts, nothing >> more. Just an alphabetised list of all projects that consume and/or produce >> ODF would be ideal. >> >> Anything along those lines would be very much appreciated. >> >> Ross >> > > > > -- > Ross Gardler (@rgardler) > Programme Leader (Open Development) > OpenDirective http://opendirective.com
