On 13 January 2012 00:09, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:05 PM, Ross Gardler > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: >> On 12 January 2012 23:50, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Ross Gardler >>> <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: >>>> On 12 January 2012 19:28, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> >>>> ... >>>> >>>>> You were looking for an opinion for Apache Legal. Robert is a member >>>>> of Apache Legal Affairs, not Ross. >>>> >>>> This is not correct. Neither of us is a member of the committee. We >>>> are both on the legal lists (I'm not sure if Robert is on the internal >>>> one, but he is certainly on the discuss list where this kind of thing >>>> would be). >>>> >>>> As I stated in that thread I believve Robert is mistaken, but since I >>>> am not a part of the legal affairs committee, only an observer, I >>>> cannot be certain. >>>> >>> >>> If you can point to any policy statement to back your belief, I'd love >>> to have a link, for the record. Or, a even a cogent argument for why >>> this should not be allowed, given the stated goals of the license >>> policies. >> >> See the reply I just posted pointing to a conversation you instigated >> on this very issue on legal-discuss. That thread is certainly not a >> "no", but it is certainly not a "yes" either. The conversation needs >> finishing. >> > > The thread went much further than what you quoted there, Ross, > including the quote I gave where it was stated that this was OK.
Really? Then markmail is not showing the full thread. Can you provide a direct link to that mail, all I am seeing is at http://markmail.org/thread/6odbj2isrq3jqg6g there is no OK in there. I don't see anything else in the ASF archves either, the start of the thread is at http://s.apache.org/B1L What am I missing? Ross Ross
