Not 2012? louis
2012/1/18 Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@googlemail.com>: > On 1/18/12 1:56 PM, Jürgen Schmidt wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> it's again me who need advice or better feedback for a change. >> >> We build several package files for our binary releases (rpm, deb, pkg). >> The files contain a copyright and vendor string. >> >> I think both can be changed to Apache because we are now preparing and >> provide these packages under the hood of Apache, correct? >> >> In an earlier email I have mentioned this already and in some cases it >> is copyright = "1999-2009 by OpenOffice.org" and vendor = >> OpenOffice.org" which doesn't make sense at all. >> >> If nobody complains or raise further concerns I would change it to >> >> copyright = "2011 by The Apache Document Foundation" > > > should be > copyright = "2011 by The Apache Software Foundation" > > Juergen > > >> vendor = "Apache Software Foundation" >> >> >> I will also clarify with Andrew Rist if it's ok to change the Copyright >> statement in the About box and move the Oracle Copyright part in the >> NOTICE file. >> >> >> Regards >> >> Juergen > >
