On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:47 AM, Ross Gardler <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > Thanks Gav, > > Apologies for any misunderstanding. > > I can confirm that templates can be included without, in my opinion, > impacting on the details discussed with the board. The board delegated the > decision regarding to this relationship to the PPMC. I'm not sure if SF > realise these two sites are separate (I didn't), but as Rob pointed their > original intent was to support both. > > I suggest we provide both and let SF decide how to proceed.
Hi all, Rob Weir has quoted me correctly, we specified we were going to take care of both. I might add that OOo people always speak about the "Extensions" website meaning both, while technically speaking there are actually two distinct sites powered by two different Drupal installations. I'd kidly ask Gavin to provide us with both, so that we can fix the Extensions/Templates issues as soon as possible. Roberto > Sent from my mobile device, please forgive errors and brevity. > On Feb 10, 2012 2:03 AM, "Gavin McDonald" <ga...@16degrees.com.au> wrote:
