Pedro, You can see from the test plan https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan , that the IP clearance testing that Lily performed is functional verification test for those areas impacted by the IP clearance work. I think the code scan work should be done by developer, but not Lily as a tester. While I'm also curious to know if any tool can be used to help us to do the IP scan...
- Simon 2012/3/19 Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> > Hello; > > Despite its evident value, I think I find this > QA testing report somewhat misguiding ... > 100% IP clearance testing didnt find: > > ooo_custom_images/industrial/README > > and despite the website suggesting otherwise, > the tango binaries have embedded GPL notices. > > We need some real testing on this! > > Pedro. > > BTW. The rat-excludes file is still very populated. > > --- Dom 18/3/12, xia zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > > Hi all, > > > > *AOO 3.4 Overall QA Status: > > *Based on the test plan: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Release-QA-Plan, > > I can > > say that the planned work are 100% done. > > 100% IP clearance testing have been done. These are the > > tests of areas most > > impacted by removed/replaced modules due to IP clearance. > > 100% general testing have been done. These are general > > functional tests. > > > > *AOO 3.4 QA Weekly Status Report as of 2012/2/29 (2012/3/1 - > > 2012/3/12): > > *Test build: dev snapshot builds: Rev. > > r1299571< > http://people.apache.org/%7Eorw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe<http://people.apache.org/~orw/DevSnapshots-Rev.1296433/win32OOo_3.4.0_Win_x86_install_en-US_de_fr_it_es_ja_pt-BR_zh-CN_zh-TW_nl_hu_fi_ru.exe> > > > > Test Platforms: Windows XP SP3, Mac Lionn, Ubuntu 10.04, > > Redhat 6.1, > > Windows 7 SP1 > > Test Cases Executed: > > IP Clearance: libneon replacement issue tracking > > General testing: > > Math formula > > Some Base functions > > *Interoperability automaiton testing:* > > Tested total 1188 files with following file types: > > > (odt)|(ott)|(sxw)|(stw)|(doc)|(dot)|(ods)|(ots)|(sxc)|(stc)|(xls)|(xlt)|(odp)|(otp)|(sxi)|(sti)|(ppt)|(pot) > > > > The test scenarios cover: > > > > - Load > > - Save > > - Reopen > > > > Only one issue was found, it takes too long time (at least 4 > > minutes) to > > open one sample excel file and UI is blocked when loading. > > OpenOffice.org > > 3.3 has the same problem. It's very quick using MS > > Office. Bug i119091 was > > raised for it. I checked the bugzilla, seems it is one known > > issue. > > > > *Defects Summary*: > > So far 360 defects raised against 3.4beta, AOO dev and > > 3.4m0. If we count > > the defects from 1th Aug. of last year, it means the about > > date we call > > "AOO 3.4", the total defects number is 271. > > Among the 360 defects, 51 critical defects raised and 17 > > ones remain > > opening now. > > One great news is currently we only have 3 reamining release > > blockers and > > two of them need be discussed: > > D< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_id&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > Sev▲< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_severity%20DESC%2Cpriority%2C&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > Pri▲< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=priority%20DESC%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > OS< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=op_sys%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > Assignee< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=assigned_to%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > Status< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=bug_status%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > Resolution< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=resolution%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > Summary< > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?bug_status=UNCONFIRMED&bug_status=CONFIRMED&bug_status=ACCEPTED&bug_status=REOPENED&field0-0-0=flagtypes.name&field0-0-1=flagtypes.name&field0-0-2=bug_severity&query_format=advanced&type0-0-0=equals&type0-0-1=equals&type0-0-2=equals&value0-0-0=3.4_release_blocker%2B&value0-0-1=3.4_release_blocker%3F&value0-0-2=blocker&order=short_desc%2Cpriority%2Cbug_severity&query_based_on=All340ReleaseBlocker > > > > 118895 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895> > > cri P3 All > > j...@apache.org > > CONF --- aoo3.4 r1240836: some contextmenu > > entries are > > not localized <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=118895> > > 119082 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082> > > cri P3 All > > ooo-issues@incubator.apache... > > CONF --- hidden section - crash when > > pressing F9 <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119082> > > 119090<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090> > > nor > > P3 All iss...@security.openoffice.org > > CONF --- Default Encryption > > Fails for Down-Level Implementations > > <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=119090> > > 3 bugs found. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 24 defects raised in this week,and 14 defects closed. > > > > Based on previous testing and my daily usage on AOO 3.4, so > > far we can say > > that: > > The stability is ok. > > The interoperability with MS Office seems fine. > > The basic functions work fine. > > > > But the accessibility, globalizaiton may have some problems. > > The general > > testing in community focus on installability, basic > > fucntions, > > interoperability, extension etc. > > > > *Risk: > > *The high risk for AOO 3.4 is during the migration from OO > > to AOO, many > > test cases lost and no one large automation suite can be > > used for > > regression testing now. So again I appreciate and thakns for > > everyone's > > contribution to QA works. > > If you have interesting in QA work and decide to contribute > > to it, please > > go to AOO 3.4 main page: http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA. > > Get dev build from: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+Unofficial+Developer+Snapshots > > Write your case by edit this page: > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestCases/ > > And place your result: > > http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/QA/TestResults > > Or you may just do general testing based on your usage > > without test cases > > or testing result and just raise defects in Bugzilla > > directly: > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/ > > Any contribution is welcome and can contribute to this > > project's success! > > > > Besides, I created entry for project reporting on below > > wiki: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Project+Reporting > > > > Uner it, you can get detail AOO 3.4 QA weekly status reports > > from this page: > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+3.4+QA+Status+Report > > > > Best Regards, > > > > Lily > > >
