On 5/4/12 8:56 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
Jurgen,
Thanks for the insight. In reviewing the wiki, the backlog content is still
relevant, but the activity to do and membership are really out of date.
Is it reasonable to archive the current content, harvest actionable and
relevant backlog items, and start fresh?
I think so, if nobody work on it it is useless anyway
Starting new and fresh is a good idea. We should focus on the future and
not on the past.
New people = new blood in the project -> new ideas, new motivation, ...
People should work on the things they are interested in and where they
think they can help. Important is that we communicate about what we are
doing, why we are doing it and that we agree on a common direction to
drive our project and product forward.
I am sure we will identify areas where people have different opinions
and especially in this situations communication and explanation is very
important to find consensus.
Juergen
Perhaps I could make a community proposal to support a UX community wiki
refresh.
Thoughts?
Regards,
Kevin
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Jürgen Schmidt
<jogischm...@googlemail.com>wrote:
On 5/4/12 6:15 AM, Kevin Grignon wrote:
Hello All,
Does anyone have an update on the status of the AOO user experience
project? See http://www.openoffice.org/ux/ for current information.
I think it is stalled and is waiting on reactivation ;-) (that you already
have started)
Are Frank Leohmann and Christoph Noack still involved?
I assume Frank has a new job and isn't active anymore and Christoph went
to LibreOffice.
How might we validate the names of UX community as found on:
http://wiki.services.**openoffice.org/wiki/User_**Experience/Community<http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/User_Experience/Community>
?
I would not spent too much time on this and would focus only on the future.
The problem with such pages is that they are always outdated.
Juergen
