Sent from my iPhone
On May 31, 2012, at 10:15 AM, Ross Gardler <[email protected]> wrote: > On 31 May 2012 15:01, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Ross Gardler >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 28 May 2012 19:10, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: >>> There is one particularly nasty job left to do - decide who will be in >>> the PMC upon graduation and who will not. In the past I have >>> volunteered to do this. I will compile a list of people I recommend >>> should be a part of the PPMC and will post this for consideration. I >>> will not take kindly to anyone contacting me offlist to make a case >>> for or against any individuals, so please don't bother. Wait until I >>> post the list here. >>> >> >> It is good to have someone neutral do this, so thanks. > > Yes, that's what I figured, and why I am volunteering myself. . > >> I assume you >> will take care to look at contributions as recorded in SVN commits, >> but also forums, translations, Bugzilla, and other areas. > > I will do my best to consider all forms of contribution through > official community channels. However, I am not infallible. My initial > list will be an opportunity to explore and validate my process. It > will not be the final list, that will be drawn up after the PPMC have > an opportunity to feed back. > > Note, it is *not* my intention to make any kind of quality assessment > of peoples contributions. I'm only interested in whether people are > sufficiently *active* to warrant full privileges in the PMC. Exactly > what "sufficiently active" means at this point is unclear. Each > project has a different bar for PMC membership and we'll find that bar > through evaluation of my initial list and process. I imagine the whole > process will take a number of weeks. Thank you! Regards, Dave > > Ross
