2012/6/1 Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de>
> Hi all,
>
>
Hi
> there exists a lot of UX relevant pages in the MediaWiki. There had been a
> lot of ideas and wishes on the ooo-us...@incubator.apache.org recently. I
> have pointed them to Bugzilla and to these UX pages. But that seems to be
> wrong.
>
> I think, that a decision is needed, how to handle this stuff in future. I
> see this problems:
>
> (1)
> Currently some (all?) pages are assigned to category 'outdated', but that
> is not very obvious.
>
> Most of this pages have the template {{user experience}} integrated. My
> suggestion is, to put a note into this template.
>
I've created that category in order to identify pages that need revision,
not only UX related pages. As soon as they are revised that category must
be removed from the pages. There are many new pages in the wiki.
Categorizing old unrevised pages in Category:Outdated makes it easier to
search for such pages and to have a good idea on how many they are and what
are their contents.
>
> (2)
> At OOo times there was only the MediaWiki. But now we have the MediaWiki
> and the CWiki. My suggestion is, to use the MediaWiki only for those
> things, which are not connected with core development and not connected
> with community building. With this premise, UX work should be on the CWiki.
> That Wiki is writable for all too, so it would be no constrain in
> participation.
>
I don't have an closed opinion about this issue. I am more familiar with
Mediawiki, but I can learn how to use Cwiki too. No problem from my side.
>
> (3)
> UX had a project "Better defaults". I thing it is worth to continue.
> "Better defaults" are often small changes which might be suitable for
> development beginners to explore the source and can be used as "easy hack",
> if they find an experienced developer to guide.
>
Sure!
>
> Kind regards
> Regina
>
>
>
Regards.
--
Paulo de Souza Lima
http://almalivre.wordpress.com
Curitiba - PR
Linux User #432358
Ubuntu User #28729
