Am Dienstag, 12. Juni 2012 um 05:17 schrieb Linyi Li: > Hi, > > I planed to do defects verification recently. I have got two questions. > 1. Defects in query " > DefectsNeedVerificaiton<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/buglist.cgi?cmdtype=dorem&remaction=run&namedcmd=DefectsNeedVerificaiton&sharer_id=248824>" > have two status: RESOLVED, VERIFIED. For verification, My understanding is > to verify defects which are fixed. How to deal with the defects already > marked as VERIFIED? To mark it CLOSED? > >
In the past we verified issues in a cws and cross checked it later in an "official" dev/milestone build and closed it afterwards. Today I would say we can verify issues in official dev builds or hopefully in the future in nightly builds. And cross check and close them in official published dev builds. But maybe others have a different opinion. > 2. I found there are some fixed defect, marked as "committed to trunk in > revision 1345624". Is there any official build after AOO3.4. And where to > get these revision to verity there defects? > > No not yet, I would hope that we can use nightly builds for trunk and more official builds for 3.4.1 soon Juergen > > > > 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com> > > > Sorry, originally this note I plan send to ooo-qa mail list... But I do > > hope everyone can contribute to defects verification. > > > > Best regards, > > > > Lily > > > > > > 2012/6/4 Xia Zhao <lilyzh...@gmail.com> > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I just created and published one query "DefectsNeedVerification" in > > > BugZilla, I'd suggest you all take a look for these defects and do the > > > verification, this way we can clearup more and more bugs in BugZilla, > > > meanwhile, for those very old resolved defects to see if there are > > > regression against current AOO 3.4 release to improve the quality. > > > > > > > Thanks. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Lily > > > > -- > Best wishes. > > Lynn
