On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 09:51 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:48 AM, drew <d...@baseanswers.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-06-23 at 08:52 -0400, Rob Weir wrote: > >> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 8:41 AM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > >> > On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 5:58 AM, Ross Gardler > >> > <rgard...@opendirective.com> wrote: > >> >> It has been pointed out on the general list that AOO is not always using > >> >> the incubating qualifier. For example recent blog posts don't include > >> >> it. > >> >> > >> > > >> > It is right there, first thing on the page, in a very large font, for > >> > every blog post: "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)" > >> > > >> > >> E.g, : https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/5_million_downloads_of_apache > >> > >> Note the <title> of the page says "Apache OpenOffice (incubating)". > >> Ditto for the largest (and first) header on the page. > >> > >> Looking at the general list, it sounds like NIck's issue was that blog > >> aggregators, such as used by Apache for generating content on the home > >> page are not picking up on this. > > > > Hi, > > > > Maybe, I just read the incubator list also I think Nick is saying that > > _any_ time the phrase Apache OpenOffice is used it must have the word > > incubating included, not just in the title. > > > > But that's not the policy. The policy is that it must be called out > as incubating at first mention in the document.
That's what I thought also - I'm saying how it reads to me, that's all. > > -Rob > > > > > //drew > > > > <snip> > >
