+1

There is absolutely nothing wrong with a list process for individuals 
nominating 10 persons for the PPMC.  Furthermore, let's have just one procedure 
in place at a time.  When this one is concluded, there will be occasion to 
reflect and determine the next steps.

The tabulation will be very interesting, since we'll know the frequency with 
which various individuals are nominated by others.  That's an useful straw 
poll.  What is made of it is something that will happen in full view and 
without haste.

Furthermore, there is no need to discuss or justify the nominations being made. 
 (There is not much value in nominating individuals who have declined to be on 
the PMC, but there's no harm either.)

I recommend that the process continue.  My only objection is that having secret 
nominations is not compatible with the Apache Way and the oversight 
responsibilities of the ASF.  There are private ballots, but not secret ones as 
far as I know.  

I recommend that no one accept nominations privately and that those who have 
already sent theirs via any back-channel use ooo-private if they do not want 
their selection of names made public.  (Since there are no -1 votes, and 
everybody is constrained to 10, I have trouble seeing the problem.)  There is 
no reason to identify those who have nominated anyone on the consolidated 
report.

 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: Kay Schenk [mailto:kay.sch...@gmail.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2012 12:26
To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS][PMC] Proposed PMC List



On 09/19/2012 10:38 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts wrote:
[ ... ]
> In this way, a wiki can provide more than a mail list post.
>
> Louis
>

Yes, a wiki can provide more than a mail post, but I think this exercise 
is valid, and provides a convenient way for *anyone* on this list to 
express an "opinion" without explicitly stating why. I actually think 
this is a point in the mailing lists favor. This approach is simple and 
based on impressions of individuals involved with this project. I don't 
see much wrong with that. Picking "10" has been difficult for all of us, 
but I did understand that "10" was not a magic number for the final PMC.

I agree with Juergen that we should complete this circle. I've found it 
pretty interesting so far.

-- 
------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"We never sit anything out. We are cups, constantly and quietly
  being filled.  The trick is, knowing how to tip ourselves over and
  let the beautiful stuff out."
                          -- Ray Bradbury, "Zen in the Art of Writing"

Reply via email to