On 10/2/12 11:58 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > > > On 10/02/2012 11:57 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> The page, as generated from the XML, is here: >> http://www.openoffice.org/support/test/consultants.html >> >> Obviously this is a mix of real and fake data. > > looks good so far...even with fake data
agree it looks good to me and provides a fast overview. When we have only a limited number of values for the "area of practice" it would be nice to have tool tips explaining them. A short description what deployment, development, etc means. I know it is explained on the consultant-submission page but I think it could make the reading of the page easier for users searching the best fitting consultant. And I would drop the .html extensions in the consultant-submission link. > >> >> I can enable more navigation once we get more listings. But a flat >> listing is fine for what we have now. >> >> And here is the submission instructions page, where we state the >> requirements and conditions for being listed: >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/support/test/consultant-submission.html >> >> Is it missing anything? > > This is fine. It should be easy to deal with. > >> >> I'm also playing with a simplification of the support/index.html page >> which you can find here: >> >> http://www.openoffice.org/support/test/ > > I like this very much! Really removing all those links to the various > wiki areas is a good idea. Much cleaner! I think it could benefit from a little more spacing, the links in the grey areas and the text below looks very condensed. Juergen > >> >> IMHO this is a lot cleaner and simpler and helps direct the user who >> is seeking support to our best options: documentation, forums and >> user list. I put the consultants and books onto their own pages. >> Might try the same with the 3rd party website listings. >> >> This is all in support/test, with robots.txt set to not index. > > All good. Just put it into production whenever you feel so inclined. > >> >> Regards, >> >> -Rob >> >
