Do you mean the "outdated" symbol, which should do just fine ??
Jan.
On 26 October 2012 17:18, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/25/12 9:19 PM, jan iversen wrote:
> > Maybe we could move them to an archive.... ??
>
> I think we can find probably common consensus that we want to delete
> pages to clean up this old stuff.
>
> For example nobody needs today the old building guides. Let us focus on
> the future and here I think less but correct and up-to-date information
> is more.
>
> When I remember correct there exist a template that could be used to
> mark a page for deletion.
>
> Simply put {{Delete}} on top of the page
>
> Or we can create our own delete template with further instructions how
> to proceed.
>
> Administrator can for this from time to time and can delete stuff. Or we
> can try to cleanup such pages via a wiki bot.
>
> Juergen
>
>
> >
> > jan
> >
> > On 25 October 2012 21:12, Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> wrote:
> >
> >> Nobody want to delete information and wiki pages only admin can
> >> actually delete pages. Even then there might be some rights about
> >> ownership. Is like sourceforge dont delete inactive projects.
> >>
> >> Still good conversation to debate.
> >>
> >> On 10/25/12, jan iversen <jancasacon...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> To my knowledge, articles that are marked outdated with a reference to
> a
> >>> newer article stays in Wiki.
> >>>
> >>> Would it not be a good idea to remove such pages, in order not to
> confuse
> >>> users ??
> >>>
> >>> There are however no means, which I can find, to do that ?
> >>>
> >>> Reason for my idea/question is that I am looking at localization
> (l10n),
> >>> and there are a bit of old information.
> >>>
> >>> Jan.
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Alexandro Colorado
> >> PPMC Apache OpenOffice
> >> http://es.openoffice.org
> >>
> >
>
>
