1. I agree that this is something to try at the Plugfest.  

 2. It would be unfortunate were Microsoft ODF 1.2 support to require the 
attribute (thus rejecting existing OO.o and LO documents that don't have it) or 
to produce it (thus causing the down-level problem for themselves in their 
existing ODF 1.1 consumers).  

 - Dennis

My understanding is that Microsoft intends to report on provisions for ODF in 
the next version of Microsoft Office at the time of the Brussels plugfest.  
That may not be current information, it is just the only information I've seen.

-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Weir [mailto:robw...@apache.org] 
Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2012 09:19
To: ooo-users@incubator.apache.org; dennis.hamil...@acm.org
Subject: Re: OOo, ODF 1.2 extended format and Word: is the possibility to open 
OOo generated file by word ed as bug?

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:02 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
<dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote:
> Rob, I agree completely with your sentiment concerning slavish adherence to a 
> specification when that adherence breaks interoperability in unfortunate and 
> costly (support-wise) ways.
[ ... ]

It would be good to know what Microsoft will do with their next
version of Office as well, e.g., whether they will have this same
issue.  I'd hate to make a change, and then have next version of
Office suddenly require that attribute and reject docs otherwise.
Maybe something to try at the Brussels Plugfest.

[ ... ]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-h...@incubator.apache.org

Reply via email to