Gary,

Thank you.  Your concern for warnings to users who download these older 
versions is well-taken.  I agree:  Something should be done about that on the 
archive-download web pages.  


However, it must not be assumed that archival downloads of any OpenOffice.org 
releases preceding Apache OpenOffice 3.4 have been updated in place.  Apache 
does not do that and other projects, including OpenOffice.org, have not done 
that.  Previous releases are not replaced in archives when there are security 
issues, they are simply superseded by later releases (or, rarely, by a separate 
patch).  In general, releases are not updated in place and patches are 
extremely rare.  Users must install the later, corrected release to have the 
mitigation for any security vulnerabilities discovered in an older release.  If 
a patched release for 3.3.0 had occurred, it would have a new number, such as 
3.3.1.

The Apache OpenOffice project has not produced new releases for any 
OpenOffice.org releases provided by Oracle and Sun that might still be made 
available via the openoffice.org site.  I'm certain that you know that.

The only Apache OpenOffice distributions are the provision of the source code 
of the patch and the provision of two separately-installable patches that apply 
to OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and 3.4-dev/beta on Windows and Mac.  These are 
supplemental to the available downloads.  When Apache OpenOffice 3.4 is 
released, it will also provide mitigation of security issues that have been 
developed since OpenOffice.org 3.3.0.


 - Dennis

-----Original Message-----
From: NoOp [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Monday, April 23, 2012 11:59
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CVE-2012-0037: OpenOffice.org data leakage vulnerability

[ ... ]

AOO continue to distribute 3.3.0, (3.2.1, 3.2.0 for some languages):
http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html

So we must assume that *all* of those versions on that page have been
patched... otherwise AOO continue to provide packages with a 'important'
security vulnerability. Based on that 'assumption', I'll download &
reinstall 3.3.0 from that page & reinstall over my existing OOo 3.3.0
(deb, rmp, and Windows) versions. I'll then have a fully patched 3.3.0
version... right? If that is not the case, then I suggest that AOO
either pull those versions that have not been patched, or at the very
least provide a strong warning that the code has an 'important' security
vulnerability, on the download pages:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/index.html
http://www.openoffice.org/download/other.html
and any other place where the program can be downloaded from directly
(i.e., SF).

A "responsible" distributor of such code might take a hint from:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/downloads/index.html
"Java SE 6 Update 31
This release includes security fixes. Learn more"
and only provide unpatched code in a different location, with a warning:
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/archive-139210.html
"WARNING: These older versions of the JRE and JDK are provided to help
developers debug issues in older systems. They are not updated with the
latest security patches and are not recommended for use in production."

- Gary



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]

Reply via email to