On Tue, 2012-06-05 at 00:12 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 04/06/2012 drew jensen wrote: > > On Mon, 2012-06-04 at 08:37 +0200, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > >> This is not being ignored: there is a lot of useful information at > >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=46594 > > You are kidding right - of course it has been and is being ignored. > > Hi Drew, > indeed it's not top priority, but I'd tend to have a slightly more > optimistic view: just because the issue has been mostly inactive for > years, this doesn't mean it will be inactive for years to come; and at > least in this case developers took pains to explain in detail why the > port is not as trivial as it would seem. > Regards, > Andrea.
I was a bit over the to with my comments. >From what I understand, the amount of work required to get a viable 64 bit Windows release out is going to require someone in the developer ranks ti take it on, as champion if you will, and drive it forward - or put another way, I think it is a good bit more then an 'easy hack I need to be more patient - there are those here that could do that but there is already a body of work laid out for this project, doing that well needs to be the focus. //drew > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-h...@incubator.apache.org > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ooo-users-unsubscr...@incubator.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: ooo-users-h...@incubator.apache.org
