I changed my mind. Switching to the generic 88 messages seemed the more consistent thing to use.
Rick On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 8:39 PM, Mark Miesfeld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 26, 2008 at 5:30 PM, Rick McGuire <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Although I see one problem with the message....it should not be saying >> "argument in METHOD". I think this is just a problem with the message >> text. > > Yeah, although I think it might be a problem with the code. Shouldn't > it be one of the 88 codes, invalid argument? > > As I recall you added those to be generic for both methods and routines. > > I won't change the test case until I know what the correct code is > suppossed to be. > > -- > Mark Miesfeld > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. > It's the best place to buy or sell services for > just about anything Open Source. > http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
