Rick McGuire wrote: > I'd like to create a new version of the API (and expose it in the > RxQueue() function and the RexxQueue class) that behaves the way > people generally want this to work, which is to make sure that the > queue exists. This is fairly easy to do....the biggest hang up is > what to call the operation? The best I've come up with so far is > RexxOpenQueue(), but it's not create an open operation. > RexxGetQueue() might also work, but a Get implies something is > returned, which is not really the case.
I'd vote for RexxOpenQueue() as it is short and may also include the process of creating the queue. Opening files also creates them, thus I think both opening and creating a queue can be covered by 'open'. The old functionality was really strange and counter intuitive, I'm glad your're reworking this part! Moritz -- Moritz Hoffmann http://antiguru.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
