Rick McGuire wrote: > Mark, > > This change backs off some changes you make to supposedly allow the > code to compile on VC++ 6. The original version was the correct one, > but I was ok with this change as long as it didn't cause problems > elsewhere. It is appears it does. I suspect this means we can't > support VC++ 6 any more.
Well, I don't know what happens besides the warning in GCC, but it complained about not being able to delete void pointers. If I interpret this correclty this means that the memory can not be freed, leading to a leak. However, if my assumption is false I could live with the warning if it is required for VC++ 6. Now I remember the discussion a wile ago about VC++ 6... Moritz -- Moritz Hoffmann http://antiguru.de/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
