On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu-wien.ac.at> wrote:
> As far as I can recall there is an open promise to turn to implementing > the WSH/ActiveX functionality for the new ooRexx interpreters, > "sometimes after 4.0 goes GA". There was. But, nothing you bring up below, changes what I said about the current open bugs for WSH. I want to close them because they are bugs in code that is never going to be used again. As such they are no longer applicable; they are in a very real sense "out of date." I worked in software test for a long time in different organizations. There is absolutely no point in keeping bugs open when there is no intention of fixing them. In this case there is no intention to fix that code. So, I'm fine with closing them as "won't fix" also. Of course if others want to keep them open, I won't object. I would like to see a good reason for keeping them open, but even that isn't necessary. <grin> -- Mark Miesfeld ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by Make an app they can't live without Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
