Hi RIck,
I'm a little lost here, I have installed cygwin - but I'm thinking that
that is wrong and I should have installed sshwindows.
What do you have installed?
On 21 September 2014 21:29, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <sahana...@windhorse.biz
> wrote:
> Thanks Rick,
>
> out of time now, but I will try this tomorrow if I can.
>
> Jon
>
> On 21 September 2014 19:43, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Jon,
>>
>> Just tried this again and got better results this time. I'm using the
>> cygwin ssh implementation, so I followed the OpenSSH instructions. I don't
>> know if this made any difference or not, but I deleted all of my previous
>> keys this time so that I only had the single key configured for my
>> account. On my first attempt, I added a password when I created the key,
>> and I ended up replacing my account password prompt with a prompt for the
>> key password. I deleted the keys and regenerated with no password
>> configured, and I was able to access svn without a prompt.
>>
>> I'm using the commandline svn version, not TortoiseSVN, so I don't know
>> if that makes a difference.
>>
>> Rick
>>
>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 1:41 PM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
>> sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks Rick,
>>>
>>> I set up the key per the instructions, waited the required 10 minutes,
>>> then tried a file log check - it asked for my password about 15 times.
>>> I tried another log request- it only asked once which seemed like a
>>> result - I felt smug
>>> I tried yet another log request - it asked for my password 5 times
>>> I tried yet another log request - it asked for my password 3 times
>>>
>>> crazy! It seems completely random to me.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 21 September 2014 18:04, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:41 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
>>>> sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi RIck,
>>>>>
>>>>> that seems to be the case for a few of the files.
>>>>>
>>>>> Others you changed to make the build work (rexx64.exe.manifest,
>>>>> oodialogMain.rc, ooDialogwinMain.rc, ooDialog.rc)
>>>>>
>>>>> on another matter that I'm painfully aware of - Does everyone have to
>>>>> type their sourceforge password into tortoise 3 - 7 times every time they
>>>>> access the svn? (I have not edited the subversion server file and every
>>>>> line in it is no-opped so passwords should be saved). I'm sure I didn't
>>>>> have to do this in the long-ago past.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Oops, got distracted while typing the previous reply and forgot to
>>>> answer the second question.
>>>>
>>>> When sourceforge switched over to Allura, they changed the preferred
>>>> mechanism for accessing the svn server to svn+ssh access type, which
>>>> requires a shell login to the sourceforge site to function. If should be
>>>> possible to set up access keys so that the password is not required. I
>>>> used to have this working before the Allura switch, but I have not had any
>>>> success since then. Here are the instructions for setting up the keys:
>>>>
>>>> https://sourceforge.net/p/forge/documentation/SSH%20Keys/
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks
>>>>> Jon
>>>>>
>>>>> On 21 September 2014 16:14, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The newer files in the trunk version are probably my fault. I made a
>>>>>> few changes while working on my update, but I believe all of my changes
>>>>>> were associated with comments.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
>>>>>> sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hi Rick,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK this makes sense to me. It looks like the standalone is several
>>>>>>> versions ahead of the full-interpreter, BUT there are some files in the
>>>>>>> full interpreter that are newer than their counterparts in the
>>>>>>> stand-alone
>>>>>>> as well as a few orphans on both sides.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think it is to soon to make big decisions about this, and I am
>>>>>>> applying this change to the trunk of both versions (as both versions
>>>>>>> require it to operate correctly).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Mark had released a sort of pre-beta peek at a new version, which
>>>>>>> when I tried proved very buggy w.r.t. long-standing functionality, so in
>>>>>>> the end we may decide to fold the newest of the released and proven
>>>>>>> stand-alones into the main version, but I would suggest not today.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 21 September 2014 15:38, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ah, ok, this is a situation where Mark's input would be helpful.
>>>>>>>> The build machine builds the ooDialog version that is in the full
>>>>>>>> interpreter tree, not the version that is in the separate standalone
>>>>>>>> ooDialog tree. Your update was to the standalone code. I'm not sure
>>>>>>>> what
>>>>>>>> steps Mark used to update the main version or even how to build the
>>>>>>>> standalone oodialog installer or what state the main tree version is in
>>>>>>>> relation to the other branch.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, Sep 21, 2014 at 10:19 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
>>>>>>>> sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Still a little stuck here.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I committed a change to
>>>>>>>>> ...\code-0\ooDialog\trunk\ooDialog\oodUtilities.cpp in the svn
>>>>>>>>> yesterday.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I asked the user to download the 64bit build, but after he ran the
>>>>>>>>> installer, although many of the files bore today's date, the ooDialog
>>>>>>>>> ones
>>>>>>>>> all had a date of 29 December last year.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ie:
>>>>>>>>> oodialog.dll 859 KB Application extension 12/29/2013 2:57:04 AM
>>>>>>>>> -a----
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> when I look at the log there is plenty of references to compiling
>>>>>>>>> oodutilities.cpp but the path it refers to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> C:\cygwin\home\dashley\buildorx\extensions\platform\windows\oodialog\oodUtilities.cpp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> which doesn't seem to bear any relation to the version I amended
>>>>>>>>> in the SVN tree,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> but I do find in the svn
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ...\code-0\main\trunk\extensions\platform\windows\oodialog\oodUtilities.cpp
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> though oddly, that has a modified date of 09Jan2014.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Have I committed my change to the wrong copy? or Is there
>>>>>>>>> something extra I have to do to request that the build machine
>>>>>>>>> includes
>>>>>>>>> ooDialog in the build?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 20 September 2014 15:23, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> It should build...provided I haven't broken something :-)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 9:53 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
>>>>>>>>>> sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi RIck,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks: resizable types sound better.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Naive question: If I commit that change to trunk, will it get
>>>>>>>>>>> built on the build machine overnight?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If so, I can ask the user to download it on 64bit and test it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 September 2014 14:06, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Since the size of this parameter changes with the bitness, you
>>>>>>>>>>>> would be better off using a parameter type that also changes with
>>>>>>>>>>>> bitness.
>>>>>>>>>>>> size_t or ssize_t would probably be better choices. size_t is
>>>>>>>>>>>> unsigned,
>>>>>>>>>>>> ssize_t is signed.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2014 at 8:57 AM, Sahananda (Jon) Wolfers <
>>>>>>>>>>>> sahana...@windhorse.biz> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> A question about the types of parameters created by rexxMethod.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This is related to bug 1281
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <https://sourceforge.net/p/oorexx/bugs/1281/> which I am
>>>>>>>>>>>>> looking at in Mark's absence.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Notification messages from windows return values in WPARAM &
>>>>>>>>>>>>> LPARAM which are provided as arguments (rexx string containing a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> decimal
>>>>>>>>>>>>> number) to ooDialog event handling methods.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> By convention, the 32bit WParam often contains two values, one
>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the hiword and one in the loword.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> There are c++ macros hiword and loword to extract those values.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> With 64 bits, big-endianly the highword is now the third word
>>>>>>>>>>>>> and the lowword is the fourth.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Mark has supplied wrappers for the hiword and lowword macros,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> code as follows:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> *RexxMethod1(int16_t, dlgutil_shiWord_cls, int32_t, dw) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return HIWORD(dw); }*
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RexxMethod1(int16_t, dlgutil_sloWord_cls, int32_t, dw) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return LOWORD(dw); }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RexxMethod1(uint16_t, dlgutil_hiWord_cls, uint32_t, dw) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return HIWORD(dw); }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> RexxMethod1(uint16_t, dlgutil_loWord_cls, uint32_t, dw) {
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> return LOWORD(dw); }
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> accessed as .dlgUtil~hiword & .dlgUtil~loword.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> This works fine on 32bit systems.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It also works ok on 64bit systems *EXCEPT* if the first two
>>>>>>>>>>>>> words contain anything other than 0s.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> It turns out that some data is placed in those first words in
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the response from at least the WM_VSCROLL Message.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The rexxMethod throws an overflow error for the dw parameter
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *int32_t* or *uint32_t*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I think that all would need to be done to fix oodUtilities.cpp
>>>>>>>>>>>>> is to change the type of the dw parameter to *int64_t* or
>>>>>>>>>>>>> *uint64_t*.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Does that sound right?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't have a 64bit system, so even if I remembered how to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> build ooDialog, I wouldn't be able to test it. Can someone run
>>>>>>>>>>>>> with this?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Jon
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>>
>>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>>
>>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Slashdot TV. Video for Nerds. Stuff that Matters.
>>
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=160591471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
>>
>>
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Meet PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance Requirements with EventLog Analyzer
Achieve PCI DSS 3.0 Compliant Status with Out-of-the-box PCI DSS Reports
Are you Audit-Ready for PCI DSS 3.0 Compliance? Download White paper
Comply to PCI DSS 3.0 Requirement 10 and 11.5 with EventLog Analyzer
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=154622311&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
