And I view rexx.img and rxapi as a form of "package-private" library rather than one of the main front binaries, which is why it is more appropriate to locate then with the libraries that use them.
Rick On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 5:48 AM Moritz Hoffmann <antig...@gmail.com> wrote: > I agree with Rick. The Linux loader can load libs from the system > directories and we shouldn't hard-code them using rpath. There is some > explanation about other issues with rpath in [1]. Debian only allows > rpath for package-private libraries but librexx doesn't really fall > into this category. > > [1] https://wiki.debian.org/RpathIssue > > On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 11:30 AM Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel > <oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > > > > > > > On 9 Jan 2019, at 21:11, Rick McGuire <object.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > This is not an acceptable patch because it imposes a directory structure > that is not necessary and is not necessarily what will be used on the other > platforms. > > > > > > > > Are You implying that the few thousands packages of the unix like world > who use the traditional structure > > > > Install prefix > > … bin > > … include > > … lib > > … share > > > > Are designed and implemented by people who impose a useless overhead ? > > > > I respectfully suggest that You read and meditate on > > > > http://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/FHS_3.0/fhs-3.0.html > > > > > > E > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Oorexx-devel mailing list > > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > -- > Moritz Hoffmann; > http://antiguru.de/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
