just want to correct one terminology issue: a monotype font is a font from a specific foundry, a monospaced (or non-proportional) font is what you mean.
> On 20 Mar 2020, at 14:15, Rony G. Flatscher <rony.flatsc...@wu.ac.at> wrote: > > On 19.03.2020 14:31, Gil Barmwater wrote: >> >> Having spent some time looking at the documentation while developing the >> system to build the >> books, I found that we actually have a set of conventions on how things are >> displayed. This is >> part of every document, under the title "Typographic Conventions", right >> near the beginning of the >> book. So this proposal seems rather extreme to me as it could have a major >> impact on all our >> documents. Just my opinion. >> > Gil, of course there is no intention to have any negative impact on the > documentation! > > The current boldness is quite strong and looking at the rexxpg book (also in > the TOC!) the bolded, > monotype text stands out prominently. Hence wondering whether removing the > boldness (but leaving it) > to semi-bold would be possible at all. And if it was possible it still needs > to be assessed whether > it negatively impacts the overall look-and feel of the books. > > ---rony > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel _______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
