I'm currently running 3.11.4 for my Windows build, I can easily upgrade to a new version if needed. The last time I bumped the version level higher, there was some objections because of some other platforms. I don't recall what the specific objections were.
Rick On Sun, Mar 7, 2021 at 11:52 AM P.O. Jonsson <oor...@jonases.se> wrote: > I think there is a general agreement that requiring 3.12 for macOS is ok > (Jenkins macOS slave is running 3.13.2). > > Now I am more interested to hear what the Windows users have to say - is > there any reason NOT to go from 2.6 to 2.8 as the minimum? I would prefer > to have the same settings in all CMakelists.txt > > Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse, > P.O. Jonsson > oor...@jonases.se > > > > Am 07.03.2021 um 16:57 schrieb CV Bruce <cvbr...@gmail.com>: > > Whatever. My point was the ready availability of Cmake recent versions for > Mac. When I first built ooRexx V5, Rick told me I needed Version 3 of > Cmake, which was readily available. > > Sent by Magic! > > On Mar 7, 2021, at 7:16 AM, Enrico Sorichetti via Oorexx-devel < > oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > > IMO the best way to install cmake on APPLE is to use the drag and drop dmg > Available in the download section at cmake.org > > You get a first hand build , it allows to keep updated with minimal effort > > It installs into /Applications and it can create a symlink into /usr/local > Tested on high sierra , catalina, big sur > > Now I am using 3.20-rc3 > > I built the APPLE ooRexx universal binaries and the test suite runs well > down to El Capitan > ( both the x86_64 and the apple silicon builds) > > Greetings > > enrico > > > > On 7 Mar 2021, at 15:57, CV Bruce <cvbr...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Apple is notorious for updating packages based on their own needs, which > is why I use MacPorts. The current MacPorts version of CMake is 3.19.6. > Fink is 3.19.1, and Homebrew is also 3.19.6. > I would be in favor of raising the required Cmake level. > > Sent by Magic! > > On Mar 7, 2021, at 5:50 AM, Michael Lueck <mlu...@lueckdatasystems.com> > wrote: > > Greetings P.O. > > P.O. Jonsson wrote: > > This will also require 2.8 rather than 2.6 for other platforms, which > seems to make sense from the warnings received. Any objections? > > > > Ubuntu Xeniel, which is just rolling off of LTS support shortly has > version: > > [ Source: cmake ] > Package: cmake (3.5.1-1ubuntu1) > > I see no issue in the Ubuntu world making the minimum version 2.8 rather > than 2.6. > > I am thankful, > > -- > Michael Lueck > Lueck Data Systems > http://www.lueckdatasystems.com/ > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel > > > _______________________________________________ > Oorexx-devel mailing list > Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel >
_______________________________________________ Oorexx-devel mailing list Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
