On 2/17/2025 3:59 PM, ooRexx wrote:
RE
Am 17.02.2025 um 19:35 schrieb Gilbert Barmwater <gi...@bellsouth.net>:

Are the Windows builds the only ones that include the documentation?

On the contrary, we are building all platforms with documentation :-)

As for the target for a new release, there were a number of show stoppers identified and I haven't seen any activity addressed toward getting them resolved. And of course there are still the 5.0.0 "leftovers" which must be addressed one way or another.  Sorry for the bad news 🙁.

I think we should strive for a new release more than once every nine years (current pace), also if not *all* bugs/problems have been ironed out. Since you pointed it out: ANYONE, including yourself, with the skills and knowledge are welcome to chip in.
Absolutely agree that our pace of producing new releases is absurdly slow.  IMHO this is due to the lack of a project leader, something we have been lacking for way too long.  At 82 years of age, this is NOT something I am willing to undertake.  If the project cannot recruit someone to assume this task, it is on its way to dormancy.

I do not possess the skills&knowledge to do anything to the code base and I have no open RFEs and the 6 Bugs on 5.1.0beta on my name I will take care of. Dealing with the build machine will keep me busy during a release, before that I intend to clean up my part of the release documentation and make sure the macOS installer is in order for a new release. It would be great if you could summarize (again) what you consider to be /showstoppers/ and then we could discuss if we should go ahead or If we should keep waiting for Godot, like we currently do.

I have summarized the open 5.0.0 issues twice already and a simple search by anyone interested of this discussion group around the Q4 time frame will find the items that others have identified as needing to be addressed before a new release is produced.
/P.O.

On 2/17/2025 12:56 PM, P.O. Jonsson wrote:
Hi Gil,

Indeed this might be happening and anyone doing a commit should keep this in mind and amend the documentation BEFORE committing the actual code changes. In the normal case the build of a single document takes only a couple of minutes (with the exception of the ooDialog docs).

For a potential release the entire documentation would need to be rebuilt, with new copyright messages, changes entered etc BEFORE any builds are run.

I have already considered this and will turn off all building platforms leaving only the documentation build running. Only when that is finished will I let some build platforms run.

I am not quite there yet with the automatization but I do think we should try to strive towards a release before the Symposium.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
P.O. Jonsson
oor...@jonases.se




Am 17.02.2025 um 16:05 schrieb Gilbert Barmwater <gi...@bellsouth.net>:

+1

Just one (slightly) negative note however. The Windows builds include the documentation (PDFs) which is retrieved from the most recently built versions.  If one updates the documentation AFTER committing the code changes, the documents will be rebuilt AFTER the new builds are made and, hence, will NOT be included.  So it seems that, at least for Windows, the docs are (almost) always out of date.  I don't see a way for the build system to fix this problem as it can't know that a document update is "pending" but I suppose it could trigger a code rebuild after a document rebuild.  Of course, if the developer were to commit the doc updates FIRST and then the code updates (waiting for the docs to be rebuilt), the problem goes away.  But we all know that the documentation is the last to be done <sigh>.

Gil

On 2/17/2025 8:05 AM, Rony G. Flatscher wrote:

Hi P.O.,

On 11.02.2025 17:19, ooRexx wrote:
This is just to say that Jenkins is up&running again, all platforms (with the exception of ams-02 (René) and ubuntu16 (Erich)) are connected and all builds are ok. Some tests are not ok but these are minor issues.

It is fine to commit again

it seems that all works out judging from the automatic production of ooRexx (full installation package and portable version) and running the tests after yesterday's commits. It is great as it is also always reassuring when one can see that after changes the tests run through in full.

This is a *real* boon, thank you for your hard work for the community!

How about offering a talk about the infrastructure you set up and maintain, what it (automatically) allows for, the current state and future plans? I think this would be very interesting for others, unacquainted about how ooRexx gets compiled to multiple platforms and tested on them!

Kudos!

---rony


Am 07.02.2025 um 17:32 schrieb ooRexx <oor...@jonases.se>:

Dear all,

Beginning of this month I was “upgraded” by my internet provider. This caused a lot of local problems and I still have not solved the problems with Jenkins. For this reason the build platform will be unavailable for some time, I will report back when I have a solution.

Hälsningar/Regards/Grüsse,
ooRexx
oor...@jonases.se

--
--
__________________________________________________________________________________

Prof. Dr. Rony G. Flatscher, iR
Department Wirtschaftsinformatik und Operations Management
WU Wien
Welthandelsplatz 1
A-1020  Wien/Vienna, Austria/Europe

http://www.wu.ac.at
__________________________________________________________________________________







_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Gil Barmwater
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
--
Gil Barmwater
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel



_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

--
Gil Barmwater
_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
Oorexx-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to