Would it be easier to have commit rights on the documentation repo for all 
developers who have them on the code repo?
Would it be better to have the docs source in the same repo as the code ... to 
be in sync with releases?

best regards,

René.

> On 23 Oct 2025, at 17:18, Sahananda <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> I'm not having a great deal of success here.
> 
> I have checked out svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/docs to 
> c:\ooRexxSVNDocs\ on my Windows laptop <>
> Within that folder I can see the tree that matches what is in the top of the 
> patch <>
> Following my instructions from TortoiseSVN 1.7 Beginners guide (admittedly 
> rather back-level, but it is what I have) I place the patch in the  
> <>[C:\ooRexxSVNDocs\trunk\rexxref\en-US]  <>folder where the checked out 
> intro.xml resides <>
> I right click on the patch and select TortoiseSVN \ Apply patch <>
> As expected, the TortoiseMerge Window opens, but instead of showing me a diff 
> I get an error message  <>
> Path found that matches the patch better. <>
> The path C:\oorexxSVNDocs\trunk\rexxref\en-us seems not to match the paths in 
> the patch-file.  But TortoiseMerge found the path C:\ooRexxSVNDocs matches it 
> better.  Do you want to use the suggested path instead? <>
> Whichever option I choose, I just see an empty diff. <>
> 
>  <>
> I then tried editing the patch so that it had the absolute windows path 
> instead of the path relative to main.  This time I got no error message, but 
> still an empty diff <>
> 
>  <>
> I tried placing the diff file in c:\ooRexxDocsSVN - still an empty diff <>
> 
>  <>
> after refering to 
> [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/11940172/tortoisesvn-apply-patch-error] 
> I tried editing the patch to remove the path from the Index line and the --- 
> and +++ lines.  Still an empty diff. <>
> 
>  <>
> That's as far as I can get.  I'm passing this one back. <>
> 
>  <>
> Jon <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> thanks, <>
> 
>  <>
> Jon <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> 
>  <>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 2025 at 14:10, Rony G. Flatscher <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> Dear P.O.,
>> 
>> thank you for looking into this!
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 23.10.2025 14:56, Sahananda wrote:
>>> It's a while since I used the SVN, but I just updated my working copy.  
>>> I've never applied a patch, but I thought I would give it a try.
>>> 
>>> My manual says 
>>> Open the patch and look at the first line to determine where it was created 
>>> from
>>> 
>>> Patch #349 has this first line:
>>> Index: trunk/rexxref/en-US/intro.xml
>>> 
>> Josep Maria has probably checked out the entire doc subtree with all 
>> versions, such that he produced the patch from the "docs" directory sitting 
>> right above the "trunk" subdirectory. So if you change up into the "docs" 
>> directory and apply the patch from there should work.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> However, my working copy does not contain that branch.  Only these folders:
>>> 23/10/2025  13:34    <DIR>          api
>>> 23/10/2025  13:35    <DIR>          common
>>> 26/04/2023  12:13    <DIR>          extensions
>>> 26/04/2023  12:13    <DIR>          interpreter
>>> 26/04/2023  12:14    <DIR>          lib
>>> 26/04/2023  12:13    <DIR>          platform
>>> 26/04/2023  12:14    <DIR>          rexxapi
>>> 23/10/2025  13:35    <DIR>          samples
>>> 06/01/2024  15:50    <DIR>          sandbox
>>> 26/04/2023  12:13    <DIR>          support
>>> 23/10/2025  13:35    <DIR>          testbinaries
>>> 26/04/2023  12:14    <DIR>          utilities
>>> 
>>> Which looks like I originally downloaded it from main\trunk
>>> So I'm guessing that I should have created my working copy from higher up 
>>> the tree.
>> Yes, probably the "docs" directory which includes the "trunk" subdirectory.
>> 
>>> However looking at the SVN on Sourceforge I cannot see where the branch 
>>> that Josep Maria took these from is.
>> Maybe he checked out the entire project with something like this: 
>> 
>> svn checkout svn://svn.code.sf.net/p/oorexx/code-0/docs <> oorexx_docs
>> 
>>> If someone can point me to it, I might be able to rebuild my working copy, 
>>> but it might be quicker if someone set up and with more experience took 
>>> this on.
>> HTH
>> 
>> ---rony
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oorexx-devel mailing list
>> [email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel
> _______________________________________________
> Oorexx-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

_______________________________________________
Oorexx-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oorexx-devel

Reply via email to