Great that you guys are bootstrapping this.

Assuming I understand correctly these 2 JIRAs: OOZIE-884 is for graphic
representation of a WF and OOZIE-883 is for WYSIWYG authoring a
workflow.....

* OOZIE-884 would belong to the web UI where the user would see graphically
where the processing is for the WF
* The web UI needs a revamp to be able to see detailed info of coord/bundle
jobs
* The web UI needs to be rewritten using a UI framework other than ExtJS
for licensing issues
* A problem we always had the Oozie developers is the lack of Javascript
skills to improve the web UI
* What I really like about Oozie-883 mock up is  the 'load WF' button, this
is a critical feature, being able to suck and edit an existing WF
* Using GWT seems like a good choice as it would allow IDE development and
Java skills
* As GWT converts things to JS we could still deploy the console as we do
today (part of the WAR) (this is a big plus over things like PHP, Phyton
backend solutions)
* IMO we should open an new JIRA to port the existing web UI to GWT as well.

An maybe we should model a couple of screen of the existing web UI in GWT
to see that it will work.

Thx.


On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 9:50 PM, Mohammad Islam <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi,
> At last, the Oozie team at Yahoo has taken concrete steps to implement the
> most expected feature of Oozie:  Workflow modeling tool to generate XML.
> Ryota is evaluating different UI tools and opened a JIRA (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-884).
> Ashish is designing a mock UI and also created another JIRA to track. (
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-883)
>
> Please give your suggestions/comments into those JIRAs.
>
> Regards,
> Mohammad
>



-- 
Alejandro

Reply via email to