On 21 Dec 2014, at 16:58, Daniel Bünzli <[email protected]> wrote:
> That being said it would be interesting to have a clear definition of what a > switch is (or will be) in opam, especially in the light of compilers as > packages, per switch opam repositories, multi-switch packages, globally > pinned packages, and what not. I agree and I think it would be useful to draft something as features get developed (i.e. before or as we go, rather than after the fact). It might help guide the decisions and will help people understand the direction being taken. _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
