Wow, thanks a lot for going through this effort, despite the rather cold welcome from the Fedora maintainers !
Not tested yet, and I am not used to Fedora, but some comments on the spec file: * opam requires "patch" at runtime, too (it'll complain and fail to init if absent) * "make", "m4" and "cc" are not strictly required (opam doesn't use them directly, packages do) but you won't go far without them (at least on the standard repo). Then it'd also be cool if they had aspcud (or packup)... Thanks again! Louis > - Jon Ludlam, 26/01/2015 14:16 - > Hi all, > > I'd like to ask for help with testing the RPMs I've built for opam > for Fedora. > > I've submitted a some review requests to get opam into Fedora. This has > involved getting 6 other packages into RPMs as there was pushback on > using the bundled libraries as part of the RPM > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060436). These are going > through the usual process of being reviewed, but I thought it would be > useful to test them from a functional perspective too. The top-level > review request is here: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1185099 > > For ease of testing, I have built them using copr, Fedora's build > service, and the RPMs can be installed directly from there. There > are instructions on how to do that on the project page: > > https://copr.fedoraproject.org/coprs/jonludlam/opam/ > > I'd be really grateful if anyone had a few minutes to look and see if > there's anything obviously wrong with them. > > Thanks a lot! > > Jon > > _______________________________________________ > opam-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
