On 18 Mar 2015, at 14:58, Louis Gesbert <[email protected]> wrote: > > And -- thanks a lot for the packagings! > >> How about we swap over the OPAM repository tests to have a single >> OCaml 4.02.1+OPAM 1.2.0 test, with all the rest being OPAM 1.2.1? > > Indeed, it's vital to keep a 1.2.0 test in case packagers introduce syntax > that isn't compatible. >
Ok, I'll do that today then. Has anyone created a Homebrew pull request? It'll be good if the OS packaging is as released as possible before the announcement. -anil _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
