On 2015-05-19 16:58, Martin Lucina wrote:
This begs the question, why did you use the approach of building the
cross-compiler as a normal OPAM package, rather than as a compiler
package?
Because the cross-compiler needs a normal compiler (and its runtime)
to build and execute. Because many packages (from camlp4 to ppx)
depend on build-time components that execute on the host arch.
You also still have to add suffix to the version number, or else
there would be a conflict (I think).
--
Peter Zotov
_______________________________________________
opam-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
