> I'm afraid you're stuck with 'foo:name' at the moment, but I agree it's not
> > ideal.
> >
> > Ideas to improve on these welcome!
> >
>
> We basically need a "this" variable, which is what %{name}% is. Maybe
> interpolating nested variables would work, so we could really do
> %{%{name}%:lib}%.
I'd rather not allow them, because there is value in being able to statically
check e.g. what other packages a package is referring to ; and the large amount
of added expressiveness isn't really needed for this simple case. Would e.g.
%{-:lib}% be clear enough ?
Best,
Louis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
