This kind of thing could happen if your original state happened to be inconsistent ; so opam would have tried to "fix" it.
It would help understand if you could give the outputs of: - opam config report - opam upgrade --fixup --show and the cudf files generated by your `reinstall` command with parameter --cudf ? Best, Louis > - Malcolm Matalka, 09/08/2015 11:13 - > I did 'opam reinstall package' where 'package' is pinned to a local > checkout. I made a small change to it then wanted to reinstall to > verify it worked with other libraries. The behaviour I expected was to > reinstall this package and all of those that depended on it. Instead I > got the following output: > > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/c1ca7d2c2ab2307f66b5 > > This worked as expected if I did what I assume is the semantic > equivalent and removed/installed. > > /Malcolm > _______________________________________________ > opam-devel mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
