On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 6:34 PM, Anil Madhavapeddy <[email protected]> wrote: > Sounds fine to me. It's too late to enforce the "opam-" prefix in the > package name unfortunately.
Why is it too late ? If I understand correctly, when you type "opam xxx", opam tries to install the "xxx" package if it does not match an existing command ? We could have a transition period where depext exists as both opam-depext and depext packages, no ? _______________________________________________ opam-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ocaml.org/listinfo/opam-devel
