Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> | Sure there is no semicolon, but I don't understand. (Unfortunately, I
> | can only speak of Aldor...). Cannot
> |
> | {1}
>
> The point is that if the contained single expression is all you have,
> there is no point in putting in a brace. If you would like to group
> statements, then group statement*S*, and you'll be fine.
1) It could happen that the code inside the brace might be computer generated.
For that, it, is nicer to have "uniform" semantics.
2) I find
[{{x := f i; x+x^2+x^3}} for i in 1..10]
as notation for a list of sets confusing.
3) What would {1,2,3} stand for: a (singleton) set of tuples or a set of
integers? I guess that this can be resolved by assigning a precedence to
the brace, but I'd rather stay with Aldor...
%1 >> #include "aldor"
Comp: 70 msec, Interp: 10 msec
%2 >> #include "aldorinterp"
Comp: 30 msec, Interp: 0 msec
%3 >> import from Integer
Comp: 10 msec, Interp: 0 msec
%4 >> {1,2,3}
() @ AldorInteger, AldorInteger, AldorInteger
Comp: 0 msec, Interp: 10 msec
Martin
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
