>
> Waldek Hebisch <[email protected]> writes:
>
> [...]
>
> | I would discourage using this form of macro definition -- it
> | just wastes potentially valuable syntax for trivial purpose.
> | AFAICS there are no uses of 'macro' in algebra.
>
> For what it is worth, OpenAxiom leans in the opposite direction: the
> recommended style is
>
> macro m == expr
>
> over
>
> m ==> expr
>
> hoping that in the future, ==> will be deprecated and removed.
> There is no grouping though.
Any reason for this choice? 'xx ==>' is used a lot in algebra
and is shorter than 'macro xx ==' so I would expect some strong
argument for such change.
--
Waldek Hebisch
[email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keep Your Developer Skills Current with LearnDevNow!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML5, CSS3, MVC3,
Metro Style Apps, more. Free future releases when you subscribe now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learndevnow-d2d
_______________________________________________
open-axiom-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/open-axiom-devel
