On Sat, 29 Jan 2005 04:24:41 -0500, Daniel Phillips <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 28 January 2005 08:08, Steven J. Hill wrote:
> > Daniel Phillips wrote:
> > > The only interesting part is the text mode initialization.  Nothing
> > > beyond 80x25 monochrome text is required, and that's just for
> > > convenience so you don't need a custom kernel to boot.  Personally,
> > > I don't think it's worth supporting VESA modes at all.  Since the
> > > card specs are open, VESA support is pointless.  This makes the
> > > bios code very short and sweet.  Only a fraction of Int15 has to be
> > > supported on the PC.  Other arches should be a piece of cake.
> >
> > Int15 being partially supported is fine, but again, that is for x86.
> > What I think I am hearing is that since this card is completely open,
> > nothing special has to be done for other architectures since we will
> > be provided with all of the necessary initialization sequences. If
> > that is the case, then as long as this card adheres to the PCI
> > standard well, architectures other than x86 should be fine.
> 
> There is no PCI standard for text display on a console.  If you want to
> see text at boot time before X sees the card, you have to do something
> special for each architecture.  I have no idea how this is handled for,
> e.g., PPC but I'll look into it.


Well, we're familiar with a number of them.  We've done consoles for
HP PA-RISC, IBM PowerPC, Sun SPARC, and some others.  I also did an
x86 BIOS, but it didn't make it into a product.

Yeah, they're all different.  Some of them are documented well enough
to be doable.  :)
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to