On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:54:55 -0500 Timothy Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the FPGA board, the PCI controller will probably be separate. But > in the ASIC, we'll simply glue the two units together with a > minimalist wrapper so as not to disturb the design of either one. I just had a thought about this again. Wouldn't it be better to keep the PCI interface in the FPGA and instead use a JTAG interface ? Then an additional (semi)custom chip could be saved, the whole board would be debuggable and still easily programmable. Additionaly, you could use the same PCB for the ASIC and the FPGA version as they would not differ in their functionality, which brings the FPGA board a big step nearer to the price of the ASIC board. As an interface, either an special JTAG interface card or some adapter to the parallel port could be used. Those who'd like to play with these features will for sure not mind if they have to connect a cable from outside to the board. The only thing i'm not sure about is, how the pins of an FPGA react while programming, ie whether they could lock up the PCI bus or something. Attila Kinali -- éãåããéãåã _______________________________________________ Open-graphics mailing list Open-graphics@duskglow.com http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)