Gary writes:
> Just to be clear are we talking about a Video Card or a SoC?

There are multiple discussions going on.

One discussion involves cases for various mainboard formfactors
and power supplies and CPUs. I don't know what they are trying to
accomplish, since cases don't need software and aren't FLOSS-hostile,
power supplies don't need software (yet, anyway) and aren't FLOSS-hostile,
and CPUs are documented and aren't FLOSS-hostile, at least pure CPUs
are, the APUs with on-die undocumented GPUs and on-die undocumented video
decoders are another matter. As far as I know none of the SoCs have
documented video so they are all FLOSS-hostile and thus unusable.
I don't understand why there is any discussion of using chips that
are FLOSS-hostile, given that the whole point of the OGP is to fix
that exact problem. If someone knows of a SoC that *is* properly
documented and FLOSS-friendly, please let us know. Luke is working
on building a FLOSS-friendly SoC, but it isn't ready yet. The
discussion of Luke's SoC project seems to have wound down.

We have Timothy and his GPU design group designing an energy
efficient fully documented GPU. Not much discussion on the list
recently, but I trust that the design is moving along.

I figure that the GPU design people and the board design people
are mostly different people, so we can work on designing the GPU
and a card for the GPU in parallel. By using a socket or mini-PCIe
connector we can make a documented video card that is useful for
many (not all) tasks before the GPU chip is ready, and the GPU-full
card will be ready sooner than if we wait for the GPU chip to be
ready before starting design of the card.

And then we have a discussion about asking Steam if they would like
to partner with us.

Have I missed any discussions?
_______________________________________________
Open-graphics mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.duskglow.com/mailman/listinfo/open-graphics
List service provided by Duskglow Consulting, LLC (www.duskglow.com)

Reply via email to