I'm not sure what "canonical composed form" quite means, but I believe that the marc field in biblio.record_entry uses a marcxml format. See http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd for some more information.
Maybe someone else can comment on the more technical parts of that. -- Ben On 12/21/2010 03:05 PM, John Craig wrote: > Hi Folks, > > Just trying to verify if the data in biblio.record_entry.marc can be > assumed to be in a particular canonical compositional form. What I'm > seeing appears to be canonical-composed form. Is this uniform or just > happenstance? > > Thanks! > > John
