Josh, I see the color issue that you see. We would need someone on the EG Web Team to look into that. I don't think it was Robert, but I could be wrong.
Yamil On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 8:39 AM, Josh Stompro <stomp...@exchange.larl.org> wrote: > Robert(If it was Robert that set it up), thanks for setting this up, > looks good on the documentation site. > > > > What do you think about adding the latest database schema as a scope > also? Right now the 2.4 and 2.3 schema files show up in results, but > nothing newer since there are no links to them. > > > > Also on the main site, I think some of the refinement labels are setup to > only promote the results, not to limit. The Bugs/Requests, Code > Changes(OpenSRF), labels are like that. Maybe that is what you intended > though. > > > > And one other thing, when a search refinement tab is selected, the color > scheme changes to a black text on a dark background, making it hard to read. > > > > Thanks > > Josh > > > > *From:* open-ils-documentation-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org [mailto: > open-ils-documentation-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org] *On Behalf Of *Josh > Stompro > *Sent:* Thursday, October 02, 2014 3:10 PM > *To:* Documentation discussion for Evergreen software > *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] ***SPAM*** RE: Documentation Search, > limit to documentation > > > > Hello, this is to follow up on the discussion in the Dig meeting today > about search scoping. > > > > It looks like Google Custom Search can include scoping, they call it > Refinements. > > https://support.google.com/customsearch/answer/2631064?hl=en > > https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/refinements > > > > *Refinements * > > Refinements are a way for you to categorize sites by topics. For example, > if you have a bicycling search engine, you can have categories of, say, > bike maintenance, bike reviews, bike stores, biking skills, and so on and > so forth. You can create refinement labels that you associate with the > sites you listed in the *Sites* tab. The refinement links appear at the > top of your search results page, and users can click them to narrow down > their searches. A search page can have as many as 16 refinement links. > > To create a refinement label, click *Add Refinement*, and define the > settings. To tag websites with labels, go to the *Sites* tab, select > check boxes next to the sites, and select the label from the *Label > actions* drop-down list. You can tag sites with more than one label. > > Before you create your labels, you might want to check out existing labels > <https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/ref_prebuiltlabels> and > pool your resources with Google and other users. > > > > I setup a new google custom search with labels for the evergreen sites to > try it out and it seems to work pretty well. I would like to figure out > how to set a refinement as the default, but even if that doesn’t work, it > is still useful. > > https://www.google.com/cse/publicurl?cx=007549852895470088378:zj5roh0k57s > > > > > > > > I would be happy to help set this up if any help is needed/wanted. It > looks like Sub admin accounts can be added to the Google Custom Search - > https://developers.google.com/custom-search/docs/admin_accounts > > > > Thanks > > Josh > > > > *From:* open-ils-documentation-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org [ > mailto:open-ils-documentation-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org > <open-ils-documentation-boun...@list.georgialibraries.org>] *On Behalf Of > *Josh Stompro > *Sent:* Monday, September 15, 2014 11:56 AM > *To:* open-ils-documentation@list.georgialibraries.org > *Subject:* [OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION] Documentation Search, limit to > documentation > > > > Hello, I’ve found it confusing that the google site search that is in the > header of the HTML version of the documentation searched the whole > http://docs.evergreen-ils.org site, and not just the documentation that > I’m currently viewing. > > > > Would it be possible if the searching for each version of the > documentation was limited to only that version? If I’m using the search > while I’m in version 2.6, then I’m expecting to just see results for that > version. Right now I see results for all versions available, in all > formats. So I’ll get hits for the PDF version as well as the same info in > the html version. To me in makes the results redundant and less useful. > > > > I can fix this manually when I need to by using the “site: > http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/2.6 <searchterm> -filetype:pdf” format, but > it would be nice if this was the default. I cannot think of any reason to > keep the PDF results in there since it is all redundant. > > > > Maybe it could have radiobutton options under the search box to change the > scope. “X 2.6 docs only O Entire Site O Site + Wiki + Listarchives” > > > > Thanks > > Josh > > _______________________________________________ > OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list > OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION@list.georgialibraries.org > http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation > > -- -------------------------------- Yamil Suarez, MCS Library System Administrator/Developer Stan Getz Library Berklee College of Music 1140 Boylston St Boston, MA 02215 ysua...@berklee.edu 617-747-2617
_______________________________________________ OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION mailing list OPEN-ILS-DOCUMENTATION@list.georgialibraries.org http://list.georgialibraries.org/mailman/listinfo/open-ils-documentation
