okay thanks
On 5/5/09, Jason Etheridge <ja...@esilibrary.com> wrote: > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Nuku Ameyibor <nayi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> i think some part of the hold should be exposed to the patron.this >> would enable the patron to see which other options they have .this >> would offer the patron a lot of flexibility.but as i see it ,it >> offers the patron some level of flexibilty but i think it just >> isnt exposed to the patron .i havent experimented with it much but i >> think more flexibilty should be available on both sides as far as >> possible. > > A lot of it is available in the form of API's, but finding the sweet > spot in the interface is the fun part, depending on how holds are > configured. I'll reply to your main question in a separate email with > a new subject header. > > -- Jason >
