Duhh! I did not set the indicators to 4 and 0. When I reread instructions provided by list members I caught my error, set the indicators and now they show in the OPAC. Thank you.
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 10:30 -0500, Vicki Reeves wrote: > We're trying to figure out how to add records for electronic resources > so that they will show in our OPAC. We're on Evergreen 1.6.0.8 > > I tried adding the subfield 9 to my 856 field. The resources are not > showing in the opac and nothing is showing in the asset.URI areas of the > database. > > This is the 856 for one of the resources: > 856 3 Wildflowers of Southwest (Beauregard Parish) Louisiana > 856 u http://library.beau.org/~lawild > 856 2 http > 856 9 DER > > There are no holdings attached to the record. > > Any thoughts as to what I need to do are welcome. > > On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 18:23 -0400, Dan Scott wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 03:48:20PM -0400, Jason Etheridge wrote: > > > > There is a bit of an explanation on cataloguing electronic resources > > > > in the documentation here which explains the second method: > > > > http://docs.evergreen-ils.org/1.6/draft/html/electronicresourcesvisible.html > > > > Man that URL looks familiar... > > > > > How important are the indicators here? If they do need to be 4 and 0, > > > we may want to emphasize that. > > > > In 2.0+, 030.schema.metabib.sql says: > > > > uris := oils_xpath('//*[@tag="856" and (@ind1="4" or @ind1="1") and > > (@ind2="0" or @ind2="1")]',marcxml); > > > > So, ind1 can be "4" or "1", and ind2 can be "0" or "1". Mike relaxed > > things after presumably finding that many MARC records don't strictly > > follow the standard. > > > > 1.6+ matches that flexibility, albeit in OpenILS::Application::Ingest.pm > > instead.