The random display is something we in SC LENDS have noticed as well though we haven't gotten around to documenting and testing thoroughly yet (higher priorities and all that). I can say that I've seen it across sorting types, org units, etc…. --
Rogan Hamby Director of Information Technology & Innovation Director of SC LENDS South Carolina State Library 1500 Senate St., Columbia SC 29211 803.734.8651 | Fax 803.734.4757 www.statelibrary.sc.gov<http://www.statelibrary.sc.gov/> sclends.org The South Carolina State Library is a national model for innovation, collaboration, leadership and effectiveness. It is the keystone in South Carolina's intellectual landscape. From: "Hardy, Elaine" <eha...@georgialibraries.org<mailto:eha...@georgialibraries.org>> Reply-To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:46:00 -0500 To: Evergreen Discussion Group <open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org<mailto:open-ils-general@list.georgialibraries.org>> Subject: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] OPAC Holdings display in 2.1? During our testing of 2.1, a question about the order of the holdings display in the OPAC view when searching all of the PINES consortium has arisen. We thought it was alphabetical by owning system, then noticed that some item statuses seem to not display (in process for example). Now we are seeing what appears to be random display order in some searches. We do love the display (especially when a specific system is targeted for search), and are just curious if there is an expected order. Elaine J. Elaine Hardy PINES Bibliographic Projects and Metadata Manager Georgia Public Library Service, A Unit of the University System of Georgia 1800 Century Place, Suite 150 Atlanta, Ga. 30345-4304 404.235-7128 404.235-7201, fax eha...@georgialibraries.org<mailto:eha...@georgialibraries.org> www.georgialibraries.org<http://www.georgialibraries.org/> http://www.georgialibraries.org/pines/
