Mike, I forgot to mention that Jabok Library actually uses the reference
flag but the problem is that the user only sees what is displayed in the
OPAC and it seems that it is impossible for the user to distinguish
between a copy which is a reference copy and a copy which is not.
An example could be this book:
http://www.jabok.cuni.cz/opac/en-US/skin/default/xml/rdetail.xml?r=11941&t=soci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD%20v%20praxi%20matou%C5%A1ek&tp=keyword&d=0&hc=1&rt=keyword
<http://www.jabok.cuni.cz/opac/en-US/skin/default/xml/rdetail.xml?r=11941&t=soci%C3%A1ln%C3%AD%20v%20praxi%20matou%C5%A1ek&tp=keyword&d=0&hc=1&rt=keyword>
and a copy with a barcode 424480018601 listed in copy location "Odborná
knihovna". The user sees that it is available. However, he or she does
not see whether it is a reference copy or not...
Linda
Dne 16.1.2012 20:34, Mike Rylander napsal(a):
2012/1/16 Linda Jansova<skolk...@chello.cz>:
Hi,
We have come across a probably more or less country-specific issue:
In Jabok Library, reference books (i.e., books which cannot be checked out
and can only be read in the library) don't share the same copy location (as
often, though probably not always, do reference books in US libraries).
Rather, the books in Jabok Library are dispersed throughout the library. A
typical example would five copies of the book - four of them could be
checked out and one of them could not be. All five copies would be
physically located on the very same shelf - distinguished by a spine label
so that the user immediately sees whether he or she is able to check out the
particular copy.
When it comes to Evergreen (we are currently using version 2.0.9), would you
recommend creating a new copy status (in Server Administration -> Copy
statuses) entitled (in English) say "Reference" which would be visible in
the OPAC and one could not place holds on it? What we need is to make it
more visible for the user to see whether a particular copy is a "usual" copy
which could be checked out whether it is a reference book... In case we use
the copy status as indicated, we (and the users of course) can conveniently
see the status below the record of the title...
Or perhaps an entirely different solution would be better in this case?
There's a Reference flag that can be set on a per-copy basis, and can
be used to disallow holds and circulations.
HTH,
