I'd be in general a -1 also simply because the open-ils-general list isn't too crowded with communication. I don't think we want to create additional lists unless one communication channel is so crowded with discussion that a topic gets lost in the conversation.
Tim Spindler C/W MARS On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Galen Charlton <g...@esilibrary.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > On 5/1/2012 12:29 PM, Jason Etheridge wrote: > >> But, as was said in IRC today, whatever gets folks talking and sharing... >> > > And I'm consequently a mild +1 for the original proposal. > > There is nothing in open-ils-dev's remit that should forbid or discourage > discussion of any technical topic, including system administration. > Nonetheless, if there is active interest in a new forum, I would rather > that we let it run as a mindful experiment under the Evergreen banner > rather than risk the discussion not happening at all or taking place > elsewhere. If a sysadmin list gets little traffic, it is easy enough to > close it, just as it would be easy to create it in the first place. If it > seems to be wandering into the wheat fields (the land of silos, natch), we > can work together to draw it back into the fold. > > However, I would like to riff off a comment that Dan Scott made on IRC > earlier today: if a sysadmin list gets created but folks start "answering" > questions with the response "You're on the wrong list! Go away!", I would > immediately move to collapse *all* Evergreen project into open-ils-general. > ;) > > Regards, > > Galen > -- > Galen Charlton > Director of Support and Implementation > > Equinox Software, Inc. / The Open Source Experts > email: g...@esilibrary.com > direct: +1 770-709-5581 > cell: +1 404-984-4366 > skype: gmcharlt > > web: http://www.esilibrary.com > Supporting Koha and Evergreen: http://koha-community.org & > http://evergreen-ils.org > -- Tim Spindler tjspind...@gmail.com *P** Go Green - **Save a tree! Please don't print this e-mail unless it's really necessary.*
