I agree. Much clearer picture of the spread of Evergreen when each library is included.
-----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kathy Lussier Sent: Wednesday, May 09, 2012 3:15 PM To: Evergreen Discussion Group Subject: Re: [OPEN-ILS-GENERAL] State of the map of Evergreen libraries? > 2) Handling consortia vs. individual libraries. Do we want to try to > plot each library in a given consortia on the map, or just one entry for > a given consortia? I think I would prefer to see one entry per library, > as the full might of PINES' nearly 300 libraries would stand out, or > Conifer's> 1000km stretch from Windsor to Thunder Bay. > I vote for one entry per library on the map. I think it would be a truer reflection of who is using Evergreen. Kathy -- Kathy Lussier Project Coordinator Massachusetts Library Network Cooperative (508) 756-0172 (508) 755-3721 (fax) [email protected] Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/kmlussier
